Preparation
of a cross-sectional semiconductor IC device sample for SEM
observation
By Prashanth
Prasad, Gatan
SEM Characterization
of semiconductor IC device packages is extremely essential
for failure analysis and for evaluation of microelectronic
package reliability. Observation in cross-section provides
a wealth of information about the IC device such as layer
thicknesses, layer structures, grain sizes of various crystals
in the layers and the existence of voids and delaminations.
Preparation of cross-sections involves three broad steps:
cutting, mechanical polishing and etching. Etching can be
performed using chemical reagents or an ion beam. Not all
materials have known chemical etchants, and dealing with chemicals
can be hazardous. As a result, there has been an increased
interest in ion beam etching. This article discusses one such
application of ion beam etching to the preparation of an IC
device sample. Ion beam etching was accomplished using the
Gatan Precision Etching and Coating System (PECSTM).
An illustration of the sample in cross-section, cut along
the desired cutting plane, is shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Schematic illustration of
sample in cross-section
Also indicated in Fig 1 are seven analytical areas of interest:
1. Boundary between the Copper lead and the silver spot, and
between the silver spot and compound.
2. Boundaries between Copper lead, Silver spot, Silver epoxy
and Compound.
3. Boundary between Passivation layer on the die and Compound.
4. Boundary between Silver epoxy and compound.
5. Boundary between the Gold ball and the Aluminum pad on
die.
6. Boundary between the Copper lead and the silver spot,
and between the silver spot and silver epoxy.
7. Boundary between the Die and silver epoxy.
Mechanical Preparation:
The bulk sample was cut along the desired cutting plane using
a diamond saw. The cut sample was mechanically polished in
the following order: 30 micron SiC paper, 15 micron SiC paper,
5 micron SiC paper, 1 micron Alumina lapping sheet, 0.25 micron
Silica lapping sheet and 0.05 micron colloidal Silica suspension.
Ion beam Etching and Coating:
The sample was then etched in the Gatan PECS using these parameters:
1. 4.5 keV, 200 µA, 65o fixed angle, 20 min. (High angle
polishing removes surface damage.)
2. 4.5 keV, 200 µA, 10o rock, 6 min. (Etching step at
near-normal incidence)
The sample was immediately coated in the PECS
with Pt using these parameters:
1. 6 keV, 200 µA, 30o rock, 2.5nm Pt.
Results:
As seen in Fig. 2, a clear demarcation is
achieved in Area 1 between the compound and Silver as well
as between Silver and Copper. Irregularities at the boundary
between Silver and Compound are revealed. No irregularities
are seen at the boundary between Copper and Silver. The grain
structure of both Copper and Silver is clearly visible as
are the Porosity defects in Silver.
Fig 2: SEM
micrograph of “Area 1”. |
Good differentiation is achieved in Area 2
among the Compound, Copper and Silver layers. Delamination
between Silver and Compound is seen at the side (Fig. 3) but
not at the top (Fig. 4).

| Fig 3: SEM micrograph of “Area 2” (side
region) showing delamination between Copper and Compound |
Fig 4: SEM micrograph of “Area 2” (top
region) showing no delamination between Copper and Compound |
In Area 3 (Fig. 5) and Area 4 (Fig. 6), we
see a regular and continuous boundary between the passivation
layer and the Compound and between the Silver epoxy and compound
respectively. The grain structure of Silver in the epoxy is
visible as well.

| Fig 5: SEM micrograph of “Area 3”. |
Fig 6: SEM micrograph of “Area 4”. |
The grain structure of the Gold ball, conforming
to the flow pattern, and the boundary between the Gold ball
and the passivation layer are clearly observed in Fig 7. The
presence of cavities at the fore mentioned boundary is noted.

Fig7:“SEM
micrograph of “Area 5”.”
|
Area 6 and Area 7 revealed distinct, regular boundaries between
Copper and Silver spot, Silver spot and Silver epoxy, and
the Die and Silver epoxy.*
Conclusion:
Cross-sectional preparation of the IC device package was successfully
achieved through etching with the PECS. Ion beam etching revealed
discrete boundaries between the various layers in the sample
as well as defects in some areas along the boundaries. Ion
beam etching was also able to bring out the grain structures
in all crystalline components of the sample. Thus, the sample
preparation technique resulted in a high quality sample for
SEM studies.
* For images of Area 6 and
Area 7, or for more information about Areas 1-5, please contact
the author at pprasad@gatan.com.
We
hope that you will find this news letter both interesting
and useful. If you do not, simply click here to be unsubscribed
and removed from our list.
Gatan
Inc. Corporate Headquarters, 5933 Coronado Lane, Pleasanton,
CA 94588
Tel. (925) 463 0200 Fax. (925) 463 0204
Contact: info@gatan.com
|